SFR, Inc.

cliffwiggs

The starter rules should be close enough to finalize. I think the expansion is too other than flavor text.

The wording for the 'every 13' is a little awkward, but its under the daemons of unusual size topic.

http://www.sfr-inc.com/DaemonDiceStarter_0.9b.pdf
http://www.sfr-inc.com/DaemonDiceBoosters_0.9b.pdf
http://www.sfr-inc.com/DaemonDiceExpansion_0.9b.pdf

The only item that I'm still uncomfortable with is the Wraith. It seems underpowered and I think that only a playtest will prove to me otherwise.

note: I did not do an end to end reading of these yet because my allergies and sinuses are making it hard to think. A huge thunder storm came through last night and its still storming.
_________________
Multiplayer Champion Gencon11/Battlefest Champion(tied) GenCon10/World Champion GenCon07/National Champion Origins05/Intermediate Champion GenCon02/Novice Champion Origins99

Dolus · Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 9:03 am GMT Post subject:

dutchjohn · Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 5:31 am GMT Post subject:

then there still is that small portion of ivory dice with colored ink.

Are they going to be special? or are they going to be brought under the other breeds?
_________________
tumble tumble little dice, look at that I'll strike you twice

cliffwiggs · Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 6:54 am GMT Post subject:

dutchjohn · Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 8:13 am GMT Post subject:

Didn't read that post. sorry bout that but then again I didn't remember the name "noble house" I'm sorry if I even flared a bit of anger Crying or Very sad

_________________
tumble tumble little dice, look at that I'll strike you twice

cliffwiggs · Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 8:43 am GMT Post subject:

dutchjohn · Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 12:20 pm GMT Post subject:

a question on not winning:

during the roll it's clear if you can't roll you lose (hence you do not win Smile

)
there is also the instance where you are able to lose during the defend step.

You obviously see you lost but why not leave the win\lose step in the roll.

You do not have to attack I read somewhere so in a rare occasion you might be able to survive your opponents next attack. your last part is kept by a tentacle, which is your attackers last part ,he has to let you go to roll. He rolls a plus, you still have a chance!

It isn't to clear in my mind it's just a nagging feeling that I can lose during a defend action where I just rolled to be able to defend. off course if all of your dice are wounded and stunned it's over you know that, but let's have 1 moment where you have the lose determination. And I know this is rare. So rare in fact that chances are close to 0. But then again if statistics point out that the chance is 0 it still might happen.

am I making any sense?
_________________
tumble tumble little dice, look at that I'll strike you twice

cliffwiggs · Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 2:13 pm GMT Post subject:

I understand and will think about it, but in general I'm happy with it this way.

If I can't roll because my tentacle is subduing you, then thats not a lose for me.

If we were wrestling, then I would be too busy pinning you to actually do anything else. that doesn't mean I lose, it means you do.
_________________
Multiplayer Champion Gencon11/Battlefest Champion(tied) GenCon10/World Champion GenCon07/National Champion Origins05/Intermediate Champion GenCon02/Novice Champion Origins99

dutchjohn · Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 2:39 pm GMT Post subject:

I am in no way bashing the rules. I want to clear stuff up for myself.

ah yes but you pinning me causes you to not be able to roll in your turn and then "If you can't roll at least one body part your daemon loses the battle immediately" So not being able to roll is also being stubborn in this situation.

Off course you are right if you hold me down you win but not with this rule setting. So the rolling does not apply to the tentacle in that logic

12 tentacles and a plus wil have 1 of my dice free I roll 1 die it's a minus

you'll have to let go at least 1 tentacle to roll.

It doesn't sit right with me that's all I wanted to say. but discussing this makes it more clear to me. I feel you will soon come with an answer that will make it easy for me to adapt. thanks for your time.
_________________
tumble tumble little dice, look at that I'll strike you twice

eggsaladsandwich · Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 12:56 am GMT Post subject:

I think its fairly straightforward in the rules..If you cant (or refuse to) roll a body part during your turn..you lose. If your last body part is a tentacle that is engaged, the you either roll it (thereby releasing its target) , or lose. Pretty straightforward imho.
_________________
"Another days useless energy spent." Moody Blues

cliffwiggs · Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 8:38 am GMT Post subject:

dutchjohn · Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 10:30 am GMT Post subject:

cliffwiggs · Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 11:44 am GMT Post subject:

The original rules had only one check in the turn. It was during the demo's at Pax that we realized it was a better solution (in general) to add a second one.
_________________
Multiplayer Champion Gencon11/Battlefest Champion(tied) GenCon10/World Champion GenCon07/National Champion Origins05/Intermediate Champion GenCon02/Novice Champion Origins99

dutchjohn · Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:56 am GMT Post subject:

good explanation if it's better for the game. All I needed actually. off course I came up with the boundaries (boundary testing) because that was the sore spot. explanation is good enough.

speeds up play
doesn't get the players unneeded stress because they all ready were defeated.

thanks.
_________________
tumble tumble little dice, look at that I'll strike you twice